Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (381966)	5/1/2008 3:40:51 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575341

So you prefer just shelling Iraq?

To: SilentZ who wrote (381966)	5/1/2008 4:00:06 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575341

Z, Trying to win the argument with the benefit of the hindsight (and ignoring the principle of the argument)? Why don't you try it this week with MegaMillion lottery. It is $100M this week. Joe

To: SilentZ who wrote (381966)	5/1/2008 4:33:47 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1575341

"How many Americans died in Kosovo?" I think we lost a Predator drone.

To: SilentZ who wrote (381966)	5/1/2008 4:43:46 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575341

For kosovo the late colonel hackworth predicted fierce serb fighter would send scores of americans back to the US in body bags. As far as iraq war goes, casualties were light until it turned into the civil war with us as everyones targets and occasionally in the crossfire. Everyone is a genius looking backward in time. Whats going on in zimbawe now is a nightmare and might involve thousands of deaths there. Hypothetically If the US intervened (i know we cant), how many casualties would we sustain and would the result of our intervention be good or bad. Anyone willing to take a shot at answering?