SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito who wrote (63577)5/5/2008 5:30:58 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542060
 
So it doesn't appear to me like there is some tradeoff concerning the safety of children there.

"In 2003, Pack's two children -- Troy, 10, and Alana, 7 -- were struck and killed when a drunk driver's car jumped a curb and ran onto a neighborhood sidewalk."

OK. Perhaps not the best example, but my point still stands, which is that there is competition for funding and lots of worthy candidates. And lots of better examples I could have used. That one just popped into my mind due to proximity.

I think you would agree that spending tax money keeping minor drug offenders in prison is not beneficial to anyone, really.

I would. But it would be better not to let them out because we've run out of prison money. That has bad optics. It compromises our perception of our justice system. Better we should reconsider who we put in jail in the first place.