SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (34519)5/6/2008 3:22:56 PM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217620
 
Rioting? We passed the lost decade without rioting imagine now that we are rich :-)



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (34519)5/6/2008 3:50:16 PM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217620
 
If the Dollar Collapses Will Americans Emigrate en Masse?
A reader comments on my suggestions for surviving a dollar collapse in Is the Collapse of the U.S. Dollar Imminent? ...You suggest some practical things like transferable job skills, mobility, diversifying one's portfolio in specific ways, etc. You also suggest those few astonishing ideas, such as have great liquidity, the very thing that has caused so many Americans their current grief and from which they can only hope to make a slow crawl back to sane levels of solvency.

You also suggest being prepared to move to another country and this one leaves me most astonished. Where would all these émigré Americans go, and what might they do there? How would our government and the host countries, whomever that may be, cope with large numbers of "all ye who abandoned hope" people? ... I can envision small numbers of Americans doing this immigration thing in retirement, but not larger numbers. If this were a realistic scenario, then I would have to conclude a doomsday scenario to be at hand and the possibility of this would then be impossible.
First, let me restate that I don't think the dollar will collapse. Instead, it will continue the current decline that is becoming almost as painful, with high oil prices and inflation in food and imports.

However, if a catastrophic dollar collapse were to occur, the U.S. economy would be hardest hit for two reasons:

Its large land mass makes it highly dependent on the automobile and jet travel.
Americans have become used to a very high standard of living that has been financed primarily by a $9 trillion debt, not by industrial production.

Therefore, for those who are seriously concerned about a dollar collapse catastrophe, I recommended increased liquidity to allow the mobility to move. I don't think many Americans are that concerned, and rightfully so. Even fewer would be willing to cut back on large purchases, liquidate most of their assets, and be prepared to move to a lower cost country. I don't envisions large enough numbers to concern any foreign government.



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (34519)5/6/2008 11:37:19 PM
From: Rolla Coasta  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217620
 
China Petrochemical Project Opposed
By EDWARD WONG

nytimes.com

BEIJING — Residents took to the streets of a provincial capital over the weekend to protest a multibillion-dollar petrochemical plant backed by China’s leading state-run oil company, in the latest instance of popular discontent over an environmental threat in a major city.

The protest, against a $5.5 billion ethylene plant under construction by PetroChina in Chengdu, the capital of Sichuan Province, reflected a surge in environmental awareness by urban, middle-class Chinese determined to protect their health and the value of their property. A similar protest last year, against a Taiwanese-financed petrochemical venture in Xiamen, in China’s southeast, left that project in limbo.

The recent protest, which was peaceful, was organized through Web sites, blogs and cellphone text messages, illustrating how some Chinese are using digital technology to start civic movements, which are usually banned by the police. Organizers also used text messages to publicize their cause nationally.

The protesters walked calmly through downtown Chengdu for several hours on Sunday afternoon to criticize the building of a combined ethylene plant and oil refinery in Pengzhou, 18 miles northwest of the city center. Some protesters wore white masks over their mouths to evoke the dangers of pollution. About 400 to 500 protesters took part in the march, witnesses said.

Organizers circumvented a national law that requires protesters to apply for a permit by saying they were only out for a “stroll.”

Critics of the Pengzhou plan said in interviews on Monday that the government had not done proper environmental reviews of the project, which could pollute the air and water and lead to health hazards.

“We’re not dissidents,” said Wen Di, an independent blogger and former journalist living in Chengdu. “We’re just people who care about our homeland. What we’re saying is that if you want to have this project, you need to follow certain procedures: for example, a public hearing and independent environmental assessment. We want a fair and open process.”

Fan Xiao, an environmental advocate who is a geologist with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in Chengdu, sent out a mass cellphone message that had been written by one of the movement’s leaders and was being widely circulated across the country. “Protect our Chengdu, safeguard our homeland,” it said. “Stay away from the threat of pollution. Restore the clear water and green mountains of Sichuan.”

In an interview, Mr. Fan said, “People have been hoping this issue would get more attention.”

The protest captured the national spotlight on Monday when it was reported in The Beijing News, a newspaper that is popular with intellectuals and sometimes reports on issues that other state-run publications do not mention.

The plant is a joint venture of the Sichuan provincial government and PetroChina, the publicly traded subsidiary of the state-owned China National Petroleum Corporation, the country’s main oil producer. Approved last year, the plant is expected to produce 800,000 tons of ethylene and refine 10 million tons of crude oil a year, according to a Web site set up by the Pengzhou city government. Ethylene is widely used in the production of goods like packaging and trash liners.

Repeated calls to the joint venture company, PetroChina Sichuan Petrochem Industry, went unanswered. The project’s Web site said that $565 million of the total investment would be dedicated to environmental protection.

The march appears to have put government officials on the defensive. A brief front-page article arguing the merits of the project appeared Monday in a state-controlled newspaper, Chengdu Business News. The article said the project had been approved by the National Development and Reform Commission as part of a long-term plan to expand the country’s refining industry.

“The Sichuan refinery project will install advanced equipment and improve environmental protection facilities with strict pollution prevention,” the article said.

Police officials in Chengdu, reached by telephone, declined to comment on the march.

Rural protests by farmers have taken place for years, sometimes prompting heavy-handed suppression. Civil action by wealthier urban residents are still relatively rare, but the movement in Chengdu is at least the third widely publicized groundswell in the past year.

Construction of a Taiwanese-financed chemical plant outside the city of Xiamen, a port in Fujian Province, was halted last year after thousands of residents held street protests. Last winter, residents in Shanghai protested construction of an extension to the high-speed rail line called the Maglev, forcing officials to put that project on hold as well.

In each of those cases, residents complained that the project was situated too close to a major population center and had received only cursory environmental review despite serious environmental and health risks. The protests in Xiamen and Shanghai got prominent attention on Web sites and in the Chinese news media, which, despite state control, have sometimes encouraged more public participation in environmental issues.

Protest organizers in each city appear to have no formal links, but they have formed a tight-knit blogging network that they use to trade ideas in an online world that the police, particularly at the local level, have trouble trying to control.

One outspoken critic of the Chengdu project posts regularly on one site that is frequented by Lian Yue, a blogger who was instrumental in organizing the Xiamen protests.

“We’re definitely inspired by the events in Xiamen and Shanghai,” said the critic, who asked to be identified only by her family name, Wu, because she said she worried about attracting the attention of the authorities.

“Chengdu is in a basin,” she said. “If there’s a chemical plant there, it’ll bring pollutants. Also, Pengzhou is upstream from Chengdu, and the river provides the city’s drinking water.”

On Sunday night and Monday, a flurry of messages and photos from protesters excited by the march appeared across the Internet. One person calling himself Devil Xiaomi seemed to sum up the complaints of Chengdu residents.

“What Chengdu people demand is very simple,” he said. “This is a policy closely related to people’s interests, so why was it not open to the public?”

Huang Yuanxi and Zhang Jing contributed research.



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (34519)5/7/2008 2:38:57 AM
From: energyplay  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217620
 
I imagine Curitiba is too techy and nerdy, and too spread out for more than minor riots. Sort of like expecting riots in Silicon Valley.



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (34519)5/7/2008 6:19:06 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217620
 
U.S. needs to raise its expectations. Believe that what is going on is structural. It is not cyclical and will continue for decades.

That will boost business confidence. See your type of view (illustrated in the article below) how make the marke think small.

They think we will vanish tomorrow. American businesses have to think: This is going to be BIG! And we want to be part of it!

Despite export boom, manufacturers cautious about job growth
By DAN CATERINICCHIA – Apr 20, 2008

WASHINGTON (AP) — The massive cranes slicing the skies over Brazil, Dubai and China can't come off the assembly lines fast enough at Manitowoc Co.'s manufacturing plants here and overseas.

But an insatiable global appetite doesn't mean the Wisconsin-based heavy equipment maker is boosting its payrolls.

The company last year added about 1,000 workers to bring its total to 11,000 but has no plans to repeat that hiring binge as recessionary effects play out here and abroad, said Eric Etchart, president and general manager of Manitowoc's crane segment. At best, Manitowoc may make some temporary employees permanent this year to help deplete a $2.88 billion crane backlog, up about 81 percent from 2006.

Manitowoc's growing export strength is matched by its increasing caution at home — a position mimicked by U.S. manufacturers steeling themselves for recessionary reality.

The weak dollar, combined with rapid industrial growth in Asia, the Middle East and Eastern Europe, has boosted exports of construction and agricultural equipment, and raw materials such as aluminum and steel. Heavy equipment maker Caterpillar Inc. said Friday demand for its global mining and energy products pushed first-quarter earnings up 13 percent — easily surpassing Wall Street estimates.

These foreign sales are offsetting weaker demand from U.S. homebuilders and automakers, and cushioning the broader economy straining from the credit crunch, soaring energy prices and declines in consumer spending.

Many economists expect the weak dollar-strong export link to remain for another year as the Federal Reserve tries to push down interest rates, which tends to weaken the greenback. Manufacturing jobs, however, will not be created on the back of that export strength.

"You're not going to see the job growth. Manufacturing employment, in a good year, is flat," said Thomas Runiewicz, an industrial economist at Global Insight.

Businesses expand their payrolls based on expectations. Other nations' economies are not shrinking, but growth projections are slowing in China, Latin America and elsewhere, Runiewicz said. He expects no more than a 0.6 percent gain in U.S. manufacturing output this year, and that estimate would be between flat and 0.3 percent without the strength of exports.

The current job situation also is alarming. Manufacturing employment fell by 48,000 in March and by 310,000 over the past 12 months, according to Labor Department data. Manufacturers have shed jobs annually since 1997, although Caterpillar again bucked the trend. Chief Financial Officer Dave Burritt said the company's payrolls have grown by about 30,000, or roughly 42 percent, in the last five years, and Caterpillar recently added 3,000 jobs alone at its Peoria, Ill., headquarters.

Still, in the current environment, the "countervailing forces" of the dollar's continued strength against China's yuan and the effects of the domestic housing slump are preventing the U.S. from getting the full export and job growth of a cheaper dollar against the euro, said Peter Morici, a business professor at the University of Maryland.

The overall U.S. trade deficit, which set records for five straight years, fell in 2007 because of export strength. The weak dollar also has helped limit imports of aluminum, steel and other materials that have become cheaper to buy from domestic producers.

Nearly half of the manufacturing industry's 73 subsectors were expanding through February, according to the National Association of Manufacturers. Manufacturing output rose 1.8 percent in 2007 and is forecast to climb to 1.5 percent in 2008 as continued export strength cushions the blow of slumping home and automobile sales, said David Huether, NAM's chief economist.

Construction machinery makers like Terex Corp. are straining to keep up with foreign demand for equipment used on infrastructure development projects. Also thriving are food processors, oil refineries, electronics makers and others, Huether said.

Terex Chief Executive Ron DeFeo said 70 percent of the Westport, Conn.-based company's business comes from outside the U.S., and that 2007 ended with a record backlog of $4.18 billion. Some of its cranes are sold out beyond next year.

"We're scrambling to increase production capacity," DeFeo said, adding that Terex added about 500 workers last year and expects to match that in 2008, with 40 percent of the new hires based in the U.S.

But other companies being boosted by exports, including the U.S. unit of German conglomerate Siemens, have no plans to add workers as they monitor the current economic climate.

Exports are up nearly 30 percent in the last three years at Siemens Corp., and the company has added about 3,000 employees in the last two years, said George Nolen, the company's president and CEO. But that growth is over. While domestic sales remain strong, German parent Siemens AG has announced work force reductions that will affect U.S. operations.

If overseas demand for U.S. products is stronger than expected in the year ahead, manufacturers may need to rethink their hiring plans, some economists said.

"Net exports ought to remain a bright spot for a bit of a while going forward ... but at some point, you have to add bodies," Jared Bernstein, senior economist with the Economic Policy Institute in Washington. "You can't meet increased demand with productivity growth alone."

AP Business Writer Dave Carpenter in Chicago contributed to this report.