SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito who wrote (64593)5/8/2008 11:38:47 PM
From: DanD  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543149
 
Alan,

If you are talking about the US vs Canada, you will give your bills to more Hispanics and Whites in the US.

And about the same number of other ethnic groups in the US and Canada, with some deviation from the mean, very, very roughly speaking.

That is distribution, not diversity.

The only significant difference in diversity/homogeneousness in the US and Canadian numbers I can see is that the Hispanic population is more represented in the US. So we are approaching two dominant minorities in the US Hispanic and White. While Canada still has a dominant majority of white.

But I think we agree on the impact to the argument of socialized medicine. Unless someone can produce numbers that show it's minorities are not served equally (within reason) by the Canadian system, I would argue that Canada is a model a single payer system that could support the US diversity.

Dan D.



To: Cogito who wrote (64593)5/9/2008 6:17:22 AM
From: NAG1  Respond to of 543149
 
Allen,

You were talking about diversity and then asked this

<<Does it affect the cost of healthcare in the US, or the likelihood that one healthcare system would work here and not elsewhere?>>

Actually, the answer here is yes. Having different ethnicities with different potential for diseases secondary to genetics/diet/customs with different ways of approaching healthcare and with different responses to treatment make for a much more diverse and a more expensive approach to medicine.

Neal



To: Cogito who wrote (64593)5/9/2008 11:36:59 AM
From: Sawdusty  Respond to of 543149
 
I really can't speak about New York Allen, probably is more diverse, and I am far from an expert. I read this morning that Vancouver is populated by 41.7% "visible" minorities, mainly due to the Asian's I suspect.

I just did a google search and found this:

"Almost half, 46.9 per cent, of Toronto's population is made up of visible minorities."

theglobeandmail.com

That said, when you get out of the major cities it changes in a very big way. Anyway, I hope you don't think that I am trying to play - "my minorities are bigger than your minorities" , just passing comment. <g>