SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (65448)5/13/2008 6:16:18 AM
From: NAG1  Respond to of 541747
 
Mme,

<< I think it's possible for a bi-racial man to get elected in this country.>>

I believe it is possible as well. I think part of the problem is that race issues are still so stigmatizing that they bring up some very visceral feelings for many people. With all of these feelings out there, it makes it tough to have an honest discussion about the racial diversity of this country. No matter what you say, you are bound to hurt somebody's feelings. So, for the most part, we say nothing and sweep things under the rug and nothing changes. I think one very positive thing for Obama over Clinton is that with his biracial background, he is allowed more leeway to discuss these types of issues without being called a racist. Sort of like Bill Cosby's recent comments. A caucasian person couldn't have gotten away with saying what he has said. But coming from Cosby, they are more acceptable.

Neal



To: epicure who wrote (65448)5/13/2008 8:46:33 AM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 541747
 
<<<If he comes across as elitist, then say that. Don't say poor whites won't vote for him. Say "people who don;t like elitists won't vote for him.">>>

What about all the above plus:

1. He is light on experience
2. He has not been fully vetted
3. He has not told us the specifics of "Change"

Why can't we look at the whole package?