SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: HPilot who wrote (21613)5/15/2008 11:26:36 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36921
 
So how does CO2 drive global warming beyond it's percentage properties in 40 PPM vs H20 in tens of thousands of PPM.

There are numerous examples of how H20 impacts cooling of the earth in rates of several degrees per hour. There are no examples of how CO2 that changes anually several ppm has any effect

I have personally done what the hell is air.
hell, look at the satellite pics of the various sounder channels.
toms.homeip.net
It does not add up. I have no idea what fuze has you stating
"This is not a theory. This is a simple engineering statement of fact." is not true.

from
toms.homeip.net

The atomic weight of CO2 44
The specific heat of CO2 .85 cal/g
CO2 does not change phase for any natural
atmospheric temperature and pressure.

The atomic weight of H20 18
The specific heat of H20 1 cal/g
H20 Latent heat of Fusion 80 cal/g
H20 Latent heat of Vaporization 540 cal/g

read arm.gov
The role of clouds and water vapor in climate change is not well understood; yet water vapor is the largest greenhouse gas and directly affects cloud cover and the propagation of radiant energy. In fact, there may be positive feedback between water vapor and other greenhouse gases. Carbon dioxide and other gases from human activities slightly warm the atmosphere, increasing its ability to hold water vapor. Increased water vapor can amplify the effect of an incremental increase of other greenhouse gases.

Achieving ARM's programmatic objectives should lead to the improved treatment of atmospheric radiation in climate models, explicitly recognizing the crucial role of clouds in influencing radiation and the consequent need for accurate descriptions of the presence and properties of clouds in climate models. Key scientific issues which must be resolved to achieve these objectives include:

1. What are the effects of atmospheric constituents, particularly clouds, water vapor and aerosols on the radiative flow of energy through the atmosphere and across the Earth's surface?
2. What is the nature of the variability of radiation and the radiative properties of the atmosphere on climatically relevant space and time scales?
3. What are the primary interactions among the various dynamic, thermodynamic, and radiative processes that determine the radiative properties of an atmospheric column, including clouds and the underlying surface?
4. How do radiative processes interact with dynamical and hydrologic processes to produce cloud feedbacks that regulate climate change?