SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (5582)5/16/2008 2:50:58 PM
From: Alastair McIntosh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42652
 
..explain how that is possible.

A better measure might be % of GDP.

Jonathan Kay: Want a better health-care system? Take a look at Taiwan ...
Posted: April 16, 2008, 4:37 PM by Jonathan Kay

Yesterday, National Public Radio's All Things Considered did a great piece on a health-care system we don't hear much about: Taiwan's. I'm no expert, but Taiwan's universal coverage program seems to be the whole package. Consider:

* No gatekeepers! Walk directly into a specialist's office — even without a referral from your MD
* No waiting lists!
* It's cheap: Taiwan spends 6% of its GDP on health care, compared to 16% in the United States and 10% in Canada
* Free choice of doctors (unlike under U.S. HMOs)
* The system is single-payor, as in Canada — but lots of private providers can compete freely within the system (which is technically permitted in Canada, but often discouraged by governments).
* Everyone gets a smart card, which you present to every doctor you see. The card permits health-care providers to access all of your medical health records, so patients don't spend hours on the phone trying to get health-clinic secretaries to send their files/X-rays/Cat-scans from one doctor to the next.
* Because of all this upscale IT, total administrative costs represent just 2% of total health costs in Taiwan — compared to 17% here, and 31% in the United States.

How did Taiwan end up with such a great system? Simple: They set their system up in 1995, very late compared to other developed nations. As such, they had a chance to look at other countries (including Canada) to see what worked and what didn't. As a result, their system is based on empirical observation — not rigid ideological dogma, as in Canada.

The Taiwanese should count themselves lucky that they never had a Tommy Douglas.

network.nationalpost.com



To: Lane3 who wrote (5582)5/16/2008 4:23:41 PM
From: gg cox  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Why criticize the author?No need to explain how Taiwan's healthcare system is possible....when there it is.

and here..
Message 24506612

Message 24508538