Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (59627)	5/23/2008 10:36:17 AM
From: tyc:>	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78424

>after that posting I spent some time in her Sedars.... That's really interesting, Marcos. Did you see anything there that detracts from what I have said ? I would sure appreciate negative comments to cool my enthusiasm. But my experience says you are making a mistake by judging a stock by its sexiness, and the negatives of a major's interest. Here's a link to a recent posting of mine, in which I tell the story of my start in mining speculation. The mining analyst I spoke to might well have said, "It's not sexy !". Message 24581560 The stock I referred to was Highmont (HIH) about which I wrote in my last posting here. There is another similarity. I believe Teck had control of Highmont through a shareholding like Goldcorp's . It was Teck's decision to put Highmont into production. Only later did they buy out HIH with Teck paper. So the connection with a major was of real benefit to Highmont.