SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (386856)5/27/2008 10:45:41 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574871
 
I really think the worm has turned on the GW argument at this point. Pretty much everyone except the liberal dead-enders now realize it is a totally bogus claim.



To: steve harris who wrote (386856)5/27/2008 10:57:09 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574871
 
re:" Mars has an atmosphere of 95% CO2. Why isn't Mars burning up?"

The question you should ask is "how much cooler would Mars be if it had say, only 2% CO2?" The second question you should ask is "why is there so much CO2 in Mars atmosphere?"



To: steve harris who wrote (386856)5/28/2008 11:34:30 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574871
 
and Mars has an atmosphere of 95% CO2. Why isn't Mars burning up?

You really didn't ask this question.........