SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale Baker who wrote (68952)5/28/2008 6:23:07 PM
From: quehubo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 542129
 
One can only assume that if AQ or another terrorist group had WMD they would have used it here.

AQ's capability has been destroyed for the time being by the fighting in Iraq. If not where are they? Why have they not launched another spectacular attack? Not only that AQ has revealed their hand in Iraq and many Muslims have learned to appreciate their threat. They are not recruiting the way they were before.

Saddam was a threat, one can only wonder what the world would be like if he was still in power with $125 oil.

If we get nuked, how will you know who to attack. I have read that there are serious concerns about tracing the source of the material. We could get hit and not know who did it. In any event the damage would be done.

A secure Iraq will not be an Iraq likely to support terror groups.