SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (387599)5/31/2008 10:01:35 AM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572619
 
You are too conservative, John. I think a ticket with Obama and Hillary would indeed increase the probability of victory in November. However, will it increase the quality of the the Presidency over the next 4 years? That's the key question.

I would argue that Hillary would increase Obama's chances from 60% to maybe 70% in the fall. However, I think she would also bring with her a virtual certainty that the next 4 years will be focused on divisions within the American people, Clinton scandals, and the million little ways that Hillary will stab Obama in the back. We'll all be so distracted by the massive National Enquirer fodder that will be part of that joint ticket, that real progress in this country will be difficult to achieve.

So I think it would be a colossally bad idea to have a joint ticket. And I would rather take the gamble on Obama with no Hillary, so that we can have what we deserve over the next 4 years. I'm sick of morally bankrupt people and Hillary is just as bad as Bush when it comes to that. Both are power hungry and will stop at nothing to get their way, even if it means to lie, cheat, and steal. Enough is enough.



To: Road Walker who wrote (387599)6/2/2008 11:16:59 PM
From: RMF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572619
 
John, I agree with what you say about the VP slot. Obama seems like a pragmatic guy to me and that seems to be the most "pragmatic" choice.

I'm not so sure about McCain being such a "hawk" though. McCain has actually BEEN to War, unlike these guys in the Whitehouse now that like to "play" War, so I'm not so sure that he wouldn't be "more" reluctant than anybody else to start another one.