Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (252959)	6/6/2008 6:22:34 PM
From: mas_	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

stanford-online.stanford.edu Enjoy !! ;-)

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (252959)	6/6/2008 7:23:03 PM
From: TGPTNDR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Tenchusatsu, Re: Link or it's a lie.> Come on, Tenchasatsu, you have to know better than that. Bob's come out a whole lot of times on the subject of the P4 & Intel's other failure of the last 10 years. I admire the man. Obviously more knowledgeable in his field than I was in mine, by far. Very smart, very practical. I suspect that if Intel management and Bob hadn't had their SPAT they'd both be better off today. Intel more than Bob, IMO, but who can tell? As I watched the link I was struck by his point that when you have a design that's ready, if the fabs are ready, you have to put it into production. And I well remember saying, shortly after the P4 came out, that the P-III was better design and should have been continued. I guess it took 'till C2D to get it to production within performance specs. Another 2 generations of manufacturing? But once there it was, and is, pretty spectacular. -tgp