SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (253096)6/9/2008 5:43:44 PM
From: fastpathguruRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Someone here claimed that Intel's ceo sent his underlings with bags of cash to bribe customers.

Link please. I've only seen you propose that strawman scenario as a mischaracterization of an opponent's argument.

Someone else claimed they knew Intel strongarmed customers. No evidence, just claims of fact.

Someone related their personal experience, which A) I am in no position to dispute, B) You are in no position to dispute (not that it stopped you from trying), C) is corroborated by historical facts D) Is corroborated by many many other anecdotes.

You seem to think that its implausible that Intel could/would lean on Supermicro to not sell AMD-based products, at a time when Opteron was kicking Intel's ass in the server market, and that when they did, they had to put AMD-based product on a sub-website that couldn't be accessed by the main page... IMHO you have to have a severely naive (or otherwise distorted) perspective to honestly think that.

Regardless, feel free to ignore me. I think things will work better for you that way.

fpg



To: Elmer Phud who wrote (253096)6/10/2008 11:15:30 AM
From: PetzRespond to of 275872
 
re: Someone here claimed that Intel's ceo sent his underlings with bags of cash to bribe customers

YOU, in fact, are the only person who mentioned either "bags of cash" or "ceo underlings" in the last 2 and a half years on this thread. The post by mas was obviously tongue in cheek.

You showed no skepticism, no outrage, you didn't question those claims, apparently because....

.... because they were never made.

Petz