SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : CFZ E-Wiggle Workspace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rayrohn who wrote (7057)6/11/2008 9:53:46 AM
From: rayrohn  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 41419
 
same with DUG should be in a c up




To: rayrohn who wrote (7057)6/11/2008 12:30:31 PM
From: skinowski  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41419
 
Ray, I see that often you label A's and B's in what appears to be an unorthodox way. Usually "B" is a reaction, and tends to move in a direction opposite to that of "A". When A and B are positioned - sort of - next to each other, after an arch-like structure, it does seem somewhat confusing. I like your charts, and if this labeling works for you, keep doing it, fine... but old fashioned labelers like myself are accustomed to the more traditional way.... :)



To: rayrohn who wrote (7057)6/11/2008 12:37:19 PM
From: skinowski  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 41419
 
Couple of wiggle remarks...

QID on the hourly is testing the previous tops since early May, right under $41. Looks like if 41 is taken out, QID officially goes into a "buy the pullbacks" mode.

INDU - The decline since May 29 contains overlaps. Is it that the putative 1 of 3(or C) is a Leading Diagonal? Or, perhaps the low of the first subwave was on June 2, followed by an Expanded flat w2.