SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Farming -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (1384)6/19/2008 7:20:49 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4448
 
The main barrier (other than the tariff) is the lack of infrastructure (specifically fuel stations equipped to handle E85). These are everywhere in Brazil, would not be too expensive to build provided a cheap supply were available. The other hurdle is the installed base of Flex-Fuel vehicles. This can be overcome, hell, I may talk myself into writing up a business model and obtain funding. The tariff/mandate gets in the way, it makes progress less certain rather than more. Look at how a lender would see it, it creates uncertainty that would hinder financing such a model (for now).

If gas gets expensive enough, it'll get done regardless of the mandate and the tariff.



To: Snowshoe who wrote (1384)6/19/2008 8:47:43 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4448
 
Well it seems to me the tariff goal is to protect US based ethanol which cannot compete otherwise by bringing erstwhile lower (or at least equal to subsidized corn ethanol).. Brazilian prices higher. If the Brazilians couldn't sell for less would there be a tariff ? Let's see good old capitalism and supply and demand at work :O)... I'm thinking softwood lumber here ;O)