SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (255859)6/27/2008 12:57:14 PM
From: alanrs  Respond to of 793707
 
Whenever I run into some version of 'the implications are obvious' I move on.

ARS



To: steve harris who wrote (255859)6/27/2008 1:29:53 PM
From: Sea Otter  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 793707
 
It's interesting, all the emotion this topic generates. I only find this to be the case in America, where some (not all) conservatives have latched onto the idea that GW is some gigantic conspiracy.

They seem to feel that NASA, the US Academy of Sciences, the USGS, the IPCC are all hysterics pushing an agenda. Elsewhere in the world people tend to take a more objective view. Another case of American exceptionalism, I suppose.



To: steve harris who wrote (255859)6/27/2008 3:24:57 PM
From: Geoff Altman  Respond to of 793707
 
he south pole continues to set new records of ice coverage.

One of the reasons that this is true is because Antarctica is not at sea level and actually has a land mass supporting it.