Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (394801)	6/29/2008 6:52:36 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578901

It is pretty clear that was their reasoning behind the idea. Just read the two things I linked to. Your links require an absolute torture of logic to get to your conclusion. Your reasoning is totally convoluted: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Thus, you figure, the fact that we don't have such militia today somehow invalidates the Amendment. The obvious question, and one that totally shoots down your "argument" (if you can call it that), "What happens if we need form a militia today, if we aren't permitted to have arms with which to do it?" Damn, I didn't think of THAT.