SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (33151)7/4/2008 5:00:19 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 224757
 
The war in Iraq is a stupid war. FDR would not have invaded Iraq. It is breaking us financially and militarily.

FDR would not have gotten involved in the middle east without the world community and especially the Europeans. They are closer and in more danger from the unrest in the middle east.

We were in no danger from Iraq. In fact almost no one would have invaded Iraq except bush. Many generals warned agaisnt it and bush fired them all.

General Senseki who said bush needed twice a many troops was fired instantly and he proved correct. In fact everyone knows rumsfeld did not listen to his generals.

Bush sr as you remember refused to go into Bahgdad and he got the other countries to pay for most of his war.

And bush constantly has tied the war to 9/11. sadam had nothing ot do with 9/11. We were duped. FDR would not have duped us or been duped.

It is not unpatriotic to protest stupid policy.

Bush not having a draft says it all. You seem to not want to discuss why there is no draft.