SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (33156)7/4/2008 5:02:35 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224757
 
The Pentagon doesn't want a draft. Too much trouble with draftees



To: koan who wrote (33156)7/4/2008 5:02:44 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224757
 
Japan's attack on the US fleet at Pearl Harbor was equivalent to radical Islam's attack on US citizens on 9/11/01.



To: koan who wrote (33156)7/4/2008 5:16:31 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224757
 
Today a volunteer army is more effective. The calibre of draftees for WWII didn't include large numbers of drug addicts and rebellious malcontents. Sadly, it did for Vietnam and would today as well. Those citizens who willingly volunteer to fight for their country have already fulfilled many of the requirements to become an effective soldier.

They accept discipline with equilibrium and would never shoot an officer in the back in the midst of battle(that has happened with draftees); they know why they're fighting the enemy and don't need to be convinced of the value of the cause(not always true with draftees). Accepting direction & discipline are huge factors...it could mean not only their own lives but the lives of their entire unit. There are many other reasons why a volunteer army results in a more effective fighting force. A smaller force achieves better results with high caliber troops, more so than a larger force filled with undisciplined and unhappy draftees.

>You seem to not want to discuss why there is no draft.<



To: koan who wrote (33156)7/4/2008 5:48:14 PM
From: Geoff Altman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224757
 
You seem to not want to discuss why there is no draft.

I'll tell you why there's no draft, because it's a bad idea. One of the reasons our military works as well as it does is because with very few exceptions they all chose to be there. Want to see our fighting forces ruined? Institute a draft. Go ask some military types if they think a draft is a good idea, see what they say......



To: koan who wrote (33156)7/4/2008 7:10:04 PM
From: MJ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224757
 
It's refreshing to come back to this thread and see that you have reverted to such words as

"stupid"

You know, of course,you know what I mean, the Obama camp, you know is so inarticulate----a really stupid campaign.

NO Obama