SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elpolvo who wrote (138732)7/11/2008 3:33:15 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 361732
 
Bin Laden, Oil Prices & Inflation
Sean Brodrick
email: SBrodrick@weissinc.com
Money and Markets
July 10, 2008

Sometimes your worst fears come back to bite you in the rear. Case in point: In the New York Times, on October 14, 2001 the managing director of an oil consulting firm warned: "If Bin Laden takes over and becomes king of Saudi Arabia, he'd turn off the tap ... he wants oil to be $144 a barrel."

At the time, oil traded at $23, and $144 a barrel seemed downright impossible. Well, terror mastermind Osama Bin Laden, safe in his undisclosed rat hole, must be grinning like a Cheshire cat, because last week oil soared past $144 a barrel.

Indeed, if Bin Laden's aim was to hurt the U.S. through higher oil prices, he's probably thinking "Mission Accomplished." Soaring oil prices are fueling inflation and sowing the seeds of recession at the same time.

Sure, oil has pulled back this week ... but probably not for long. Prices dropped because of a rally in the U.S. dollar and because tensions eased in the stand-off between Iran and Israel. But here are some arguments for the bullish side ...

* No production boost from our Saudi 'Friends'. Saudi Arabian Oil Minister Ali Naimi said last week in Madrid that the world's biggest oil exporter had no immediate plans to boost crude output because there was no need to do so.

This is a complete about-face from what the Saudis said last month -- that they would boost production by 200,000 barrels per day on top of a 300,000 barrel per day hike in May. But it doesn't surprise me, and it shouldn't surprise you. With friends like Saudi Arabia -- home to 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers -- we don't need enemies.

* OPEC President says oil market is well-supplied. On Sunday, OPEC president Chakib Khelil warned that oil prices will continue to rise. "As producer countries we think that the current supply is sufficient, that this balance in supply is in everybody's interests and that it shouldn't be disturbed," Khelil said. In other words, OPEC is in no rush to raise production.

OPEC has warned that oil prices will continue to rise.
Khelil went on to say that the longer-term trend in the U.S. dollar was down, adding that this would force oil prices even higher. "I believe that 60% of the rise is due to the fall in the exchange rate of the dollar and to geopolitical problems."

Indeed, looking at the dramatic run-up of oil prices in U.S. dollar terms as compared to other currencies proves quite revealing. About 50% of the increased pain you feel at the pump these days is due to the falling dollar.

* Production at Mexico's giant Cantarell oil field is falling off a cliff! Crude output from Cantarell, the world's third-largest oil field, is falling at the fastest pace in 12 years -- down a stunning 34% in May from a year earlier, or a loss of more than 540,000 barrels a day. The last time Cantarell suffered a production loss this bad, it was slammed by a major hurricane.

A couple weeks ago, I said right here in my Money and Markets column that Mexico's oil exports could halt by the end of 2010. If Cantarell is dying, I was TOO optimistic.

Naturally, falling production is curbing exports to the U.S., which buys about 80% of Mexico's oil exports. Sales to the U.S. tumbled to 1.07 million barrels per day in May from 1.4 million barrels per day in September.

All in all, I wouldn't be surprised to see a sizeable pullback in oil prices -- a normal and necessary part of any bull market -- but I think we're on a collision course with Peak Oil.

And that's going to leave a mark. Let's look at the damage so far ...

Oil's Domino Effect Fueling Red-Hot Inflation

As oil prices climb ever higher, businesses have to pass along the cost. Example: My cousin Peggy and her husband Gary run an invisible fence (electronic collars that keep dogs in the yard) company in Maine. The fuel costs of their vehicles jumped $9,000 in the first half of the year.

"Are you going to raise your prices?" I asked Gary.

"Oh yeah," Gary replied. "Everybody is. We have to pass along the cost of gasoline."

Indeed, it's not just Gary. On my most recent trip, I saw major airlines, taxi drivers, buses and small mom-and-pop restaurants all raising prices.

And the financial impact of higher oil prices goes far beyond fuel and food purchases. Thousands of products Americans buy every day -- from toothpaste to deodorant, CDs to computers, clothing to furniture, shampoo, shaving cream and plastic cups -- all contain oil.

According to the American Petroleum Institute, a little more than one gallon of each barrel of oil goes into such everyday products as toothpaste, house paint and cosmetics. Since we use over 20 million barrels of oil per day, that means we're burning through 20 million gallons a day before ever firing up our engines.

Manufacturers of everything from wallpaper to cereal are feeling the pinch. The Institute for Supply Management said last week that its index of prices manufacturers pay for raw materials hit 91.5 in June, up from 87 in May. That's the highest reading since inflation exploded back in 1979.

We're witnessing a classic domino effect; every time oil hits a new record high, the price of nearly EVERY product and service in the U.S. goes up accordingly. The proof: U.S. consumer prices surged 4.2% year-over-year through the end of May.

I expect rising energy prices will continue driving the cost of most goods and services higher and higher. According to the brainy folks who run the Calculated Risk website, energy consumption as a percent of U.S. GDP will rocket to over 14% in 2008 -- a new record.

Inflationary? You bet!

But the Energy Information Administration data shows that, in June, oil demand in the U.S. fell by nearly 400,000 barrels a day from a year earlier, to 20.342 million barrels a day. That is the weakest demand level for all of June since 2003.

How can oil prices go up when our domestic demand goes down? Because people in China, India and the rest of the developing world are lining up to buy every barrel of oil we don't use ... and then some!

What's the end-game here? I think you'll agree that we can't sit here and talk any longer about record oil prices and sizzling inflation without saying the R-word. So ...

Is a Recession Around the Corner?

This brings us to a strange conundrum where U.S. consumers could experience both red-hot inflation and a recession at the same time.

As for signs of a recession ...

Not all prices are going up. One sector where consumers have a choice whether to buy or not is going down ... way down. The latest S&P/Case-Shiller index of home prices in the 20 largest U.S. markets fell by a record 15.3% in April from a year earlier, accelerating from March's 14.3% drop.

The Labor Department in Washington said the U.S. economy lost 62,000 jobs in June -- dropping for the sixth month in a row -- and the jobless rate held at 5.5%, the highest since October 2004. More than 324,000 U.S. jobs have been lost so far in 2008.

In the U.S., GDP growth averaged an annual rate of only 0.8% in the six months ended March 31, the weakest six-month performance in five years. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development recently cut the growth forecast for its 30 members to 1.8 percent for this year, which would be the slowest rate since 2002.
Perhaps most damaging of all is the fact that 75% of Americans think the U.S. is already IN a recession!

Why? Despite all the dollar pep-rallies in Washington, millions of consumers have gotten wise to the fact that instead of getting the federal budget under control and aggressively battling inflation, the U.S. government is simply printing money with reckless abandon.

As a result of this artificial State stimulation, the dollar has gotten creamed. Consumers' purchasing power has come under assault. Inflation has skyrocketed. And if the court of public opinion is to be believed, we're in a recession.

The ugly truth about all this is that since oil is priced in dollars, as one goes down, the other tends to go up. It's what I call "The Seesaw of Pain" ...

As I mentioned earlier, 50% of the rise in oil prices this year is attributed to the fall in the U.S. dollar. So until Congress, the White House and the Federal Reserve finally get their act together, I think you can expect to see more of the same.

In the meantime, here are ...

Three Ways to Hedge Against And Even Profit From Inflation

#1) Hedge your fuel costs like the airlines. Autoweek reports that a company called MyGallons.com lets members buy gasoline via its website at a predetermined average price for the area where they live. The gallons are loaded onto a debit card that the company says is accepted at more than 95% of the nation's fueling stations. MyGallons charges members an annual fee of $29.95 or $39.95 for the service.

Based on how many gallons you buy, the service sends you a debit card that lets you purchase as much fuel (per gallon, not dollar) as you have stored up.

So let's have some fun with math. Let's say you think the price of gasoline is going up an average 50 cents in the next year, and you drive 12,000 miles a year in a car that gets 24 miles to the gallon. That means you'd use 500 gallons in the next year, and if you're right about the price rise, you'd pay an extra $250 for gasoline over what you pay now. So, it might be worth your while to hedge your fuel costs.

The MyGallons concept is similar to Chrysler's current program that promotes a set $2.99 a gallon for fuel for three years. Chrysler's program limits the guaranteed fuel price to the equivalent of 12,000 miles per year, whereas MyGallons members can buy as much fuel as they need.

MyGallons launched a pilot program in April, and estimates that the testers paid about $3.10 a gallon for gas, saving roughly a dollar over today's prices.

Just remember, gasoline prices can go down as well as up, and if you hedge too much at too high a price, you'll rue it later.

The MyGallons program is something you can do right now to lock in lower prices if you think oil and therefore gasoline are going higher.

With energy and inflation ramping up, you'll also want investments that will rise with both. Select energy stocks could be a good bet, but many stocks will get killed in a recession. So here are a couple of exchange-traded funds that track oil and gold.

#2) iPath S&P GSCI Crude Oil Total Return (OIL). This ETF tracks oil prices closely (but not exactly). It's similar to another favorite of mine, the United States Oil Fund ETF (USO). Both offer easy ways to get direct exposure to rising oil prices.

#3) SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Formerly known as StreetTracks Gold ETF, this exchange-traded fund holds physical gold and tracks the metal very closely. Gold is another commodity that is priced in dollars, so as inflation takes off and the value of the dollar goes down, gold should go up.

Yours for trading profits,

Sean
email: SBrodrick@weissinc.com
321energy.com



To: elpolvo who wrote (138732)7/14/2008 9:06:24 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361732
 
InBev Agrees to Buy Anheuser-Busch for $52 Billion (Update3)

By Duane D. Stanford

July 14 (Bloomberg) -- InBev NV will buy Anheuser-Busch Cos. for $52 billion, putting the maker of Budweiser beer under Belgian control after almost 156 years as a family-run company.

The $70-a-share transaction ends a month of court fights and public denunciations as InBev tried to acquire the St. Louis-based beermaker in a hostile takeover. Leuven, Belgium- based InBev lifted its initial offer by 7.7 percent and agreed to rename itself Anheuser-Busch InBev, the brewers said today.

InBev now faces the task of persuading local labor leaders, politicians and customers to support the combination, which adds the 132-year-old Budweiser brand to Germany's Beck's lager and Bass ale in the U.K. The Belgian company will overtake SABMiller Plc as the world's largest beermaker by volume. Members of the founding Busch family, including Chief Executive Officer August A. Busch IV, initially opposed a sale.

``This is about giving InBev a U.S. presence and this is the most effective way they can see to achieve that,'' said Grant Saligari, a beverage industry analyst at Commonwealth Securities Ltd. in Sydney. ``Consumers are very emotionally attached to their beers. A peaceful deal helps maintain that.''

The bid follows SABMiller's agreement to combine its U.S. businesses with Molson Coors Brewing Co. as U.S. industry sales approach $100 billion, according to Euromonitor Plc.

InBev Chief Executive Officer Carlos Brito will become the combined company's CEO, and August Busch IV and another current or former director of the U.S. company will join the board.

Anheuser's Gains

InBev rose 1.87 euros, or 4.2 percent, to 46.37 euros at 9:56 a.m. in Brussels trading. Anheuser-Busch, which climbed 26 percent after reports of InBev's planned bid in May, gained $1.71, or 2.6 percent, to $68.21 in Frankfurt trading.

The transaction will be the biggest cash takeover on record and second among U.S. consumer-products acquisitions to Procter & Gamble Co.'s purchase of Gillette Co. for $57 billion in 2005.

``You really couldn't have wished for a much better deal,'' said Tom Pirko, president of Bevmark LLC, a consulting firm in Buellton, California. ``Shareholders thought it would be a hostile bid and the company would be wrecked.'' Pirko's firm has analyzed the beverage industry for 30 years.

Grupo Modelo SAB, the Mexican brewer that's half owned by Anheuser-Busch, said in a separate statement that it hasn't yet decided whether it will stay with InBev after the sale is completed. Modelo said it has a right under Mexican law to decide on its partner and has been in talks with InBev.

Buffett's Stake

At $70 a share, InBev is paying about 11 times Anheuser's 2009 projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, based on analysts' estimates compiled by Bloomberg. SABMiller paid about 14 times Ebitda for Royal Grolsch NV last year, according to Petercam SA's Kris Kippers.

InBev said the purchase will be ``neutral'' to 2009 earnings per share and should boost EPS from the following year. The company expects cost savings of $1.5 billion annually by 2010, and it will keep all of Anheuser's U.S. breweries open.

``In InBev already today, there's a mix of a lot of geography and cultures, so why would adding a North American operation not work?'' said Wim Hoste, a Brussels-based KBC Securities analyst, in a Bloomberg Television interview.

Billionaire investor Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is Anheuser-Busch's second-largest shareholder, with a 5 percent stake. Barclays Plc owned 6.1 percent of the U.S. brewer as of March 31, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Cost Cuts

InBev's Brito said the combined company's more than $36 billion in annual sales and 12 billion gallons of shipments will allow the negotiation of better terms from suppliers as expenses soar for barley, hops, electricity and metal for beer cans.

``Now with Budweiser as our global flagship brand, that'll give us a great platform to develop that brand together with Beck's and Stella Artois,'' Brito said today in an interview broadcast on the Cantos Web site.

InBev may have trouble lowering costs given potential resistance from Anheuser-Busch's unions and the low market overlap between the two companies, according to Wachovia Securities Inc. analyst Jonathan Feeney.

The Belgian company, the maker of Stella Artois and Leffe Belgian ales, hired Lazard Ltd., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank AG and BNP Paribas SA to advise it in the month-long fight. Anheuser-Busch's advisers include Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co., Citigroup Inc., and Moelis & Co.

Bridge Loans

InBev will finance the purchase with $45 billion of debt, including $7 billion of bridge financing for divestitures of ``non-core'' assets from both companies. The brewer said it also received commitments for as much as $9.8 billion in bridge financing to provide it with flexibility on the timing of a stock sale after the purchase.

InBev's lenders are Banco Santander SA, Deutsche Bank, Barclays Plc, JPMorgan Chase, Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, BNP Paribas SA, Fortis, ING Groep NV, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ and Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd.

InBev, which traces its roots to 1366, took its current form in 2004, when Interbrew SA bought Sao Paulo's Cia. de Bebidas das Americas, or AmBev, in an $11 billion transaction.

Through 20 years of acquisitions, InBev expanded from family-owned Flemish beers to surpass Anheuser-Busch in sales while dominating Latin America.

The Belgian company will get control of half the U.S. beer market and will grow in China, where Anheuser owns 27 percent of Tsingtao Brewery Co., the country's second-largest brewer.

The U.S. brewer spurned InBev's original $46.3 billion proposal on June 26 as ``financially inadequate,'' while keeping the door open for a higher offer from InBev or another suitor. That rejection came three hours after InBev made its bid hostile and announced plans to fire the brewer's directors.

The Busch family, which doesn't own enough stock to block a bid, was split over the initial offer. August Busch IV said earlier this year that the company wouldn't be sold ``under my watch,'' while an uncle, Adolphus Busch IV, urged Anheuser's board to accept the InBev proposal.

To contact the reporters on this story: Duane D. Stanford at dstanford2@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: July 14, 2008 04:13 EDT



To: elpolvo who wrote (138732)7/16/2008 6:14:03 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 361732
 
Obama harnesses power of Web social networking

seattletimes.nwsource.com