Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (22202)	7/15/2008 1:22:18 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

I see you still have not posted the numerous links to Falsification you earlier claimed Why are you still rattling on about this? I did not say the links were in http format, was this your expectation? Even a "brilliant" engineer like yourself can google the words can't you??

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (22202)	7/15/2008 1:52:04 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Regarding the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. en.wikipedia.org and your statements the assumptions that conduction and convection are zero in the transfer of heat from the earth surface is idiotic. & Also it is based upon the 2nd law of thermodynamics being suspended No, as I understand it, actually the paper assumes the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is working normally. As much conduction and convection can go into the atmosphere as happens in real atmospheres. 4. The only way the fourth power of the surface temperature can exceed this limit is to be covered by an atmosphere that is at least partially opaque to infrared radiation. This is the atmospheric greenhouse effect. That is how I see it. Maybe you could enlighten us further??