SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Math Junkie who wrote (37059)7/17/2008 6:21:24 PM
From: Elmer Phud  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42834
 
Math Junkie -

I'm not going to debate the science because I'm not qualified to. I would observe that there are many scientists on both sides of this issue and each side has very impressive credentials. One side, the "Global Warming is primarily man made" (GWIPMM) is saying the science is settled and no responsible scientist debates the question. Possessing equally impressive credentials, the other side says the science is not at all settled and is apparently defined as irresponsible simply because they don't agree with the GWIPMM side. An outside observer must reasonably conclude that if a large number of highly qualified scientists are debating a topic, the topic can not be settled, by definition. Still others argue that there is no global warming at all.