Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (22299)	7/19/2008 12:03:47 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Neolib, the problem is you see everyone who disagrees with your GW theories as some kind of crack-pot. The cognitive dissonance you show, by emotionally calling me names such as stupid when I decimate your vapid positions is truly laughable. On the one hand you say, listen to the scientists. Then when presented with over 35,000 scientists who don't agree with you and the IPCC, you dismiss them as crack-pots without offering any contradictory list of scientists who support your gloom and doom theories. Here's another person I'm sure you will define as stupid. The Global Warming part of the conversation starts about 10 minutes into the interview. Consensus science is not science. If you have a climate model you believe in, run it out ten years and prove it's validity. Then come back and you may have a decent argument. Thus far, all the worshippers of Al Gore models have been proven wrong. video.google.com