SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ruffian who wrote (400895)7/23/2008 12:44:14 AM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1574773
 


He explained why he would still oppose a troop increase in Iraq, saying it does not meet the long-term U.S. strategic goal and that the emphasis on Iraq had taken a toll on the U.S. effort in Afghanistan.

This is just about the most idiotic position I've ever heard a candidate take.

Is there no way in hell this fool can admit he made a freaking mistake?



To: Ruffian who wrote (400895)7/23/2008 6:25:32 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574773
 
He admits the surge worked, but he still wouldn't have done it. Makes sense when you realize he's the candidate of people who don't want us to win.



To: Ruffian who wrote (400895)7/23/2008 7:43:22 AM
From: steve harris  Respond to of 1574773
 
CBS asked him a tough question?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News