Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (400935)	7/23/2008 9:45:51 AM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1576823

"You sell your house for half what you paid for it. But your MORTGAGE hasn't been reduced by half. " Details, details... Why focus on minutia? "You guys aren't deep thinkers, are you?" Well, no. That would be elitist.

To: bentway who wrote (400935)	7/23/2008 9:47:41 AM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 1576823

You're broke, you can't buy a new house. You guys aren't deep thinkers, are you? It's trickle down home financing... you trickle down to homelessness.

To: bentway who wrote (400935)	7/23/2008 10:50:05 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1576823

You sell your house for half what you paid for it. But your MORTGAGE hasn't been reduced by half. You pay the difference. In practice it doesn't work this way, at all. I've handled hundreds of these on peoples' tax returns during the crash of the 80s, and I've never seen a person pay off a deficiency. What happens is a person owes 300K on a house that's worth 200K. He says, "I'm not spending the next 20 years of my life paying for this turkey." So he walks away from it. The house is handled through the state's foreclosure process (in some states, sold on the courthouse steps to the highest bidder). Frequently, the property is "bid in" by the mortgage holder, but an attempt will be made to get FMV for the property, 200K in this example. Ultimately, a deficiency judgment is entered against the homeowner for $100K plus fees, etc. That 100K can be settled if the homeowner has any money, typically for cents on the dollar. But as you say, most times, the homeowner doesn't have the money. So, it is a judgment against the homeowner but is never collected unless he just falls ass-backwards into enough money to choose to settle it. I've seen many millions of dollars worth of these judgments just evaporate into thin air (other than the tax consequences, which can be a problem).