SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (76183)7/24/2008 10:00:12 AM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 543225
 
I heard a caller on the radio yesterday - a woman who was doing a job at a company whose ethics were different from her own in some way I don't remember (I think maybe they made birth control pills or something). But she didn't want to leave because her insurance through this company covered her infertility treatments.

Does this strike you as sort of strange on a couple of levels? The first that she objects to preventing conception on religious grounds, but obviously isn't willing to accept her own condition? (But maybe there is more to her condition than she said, so I won't belabor that one. It just intrigued me)

But should insurance cover something that isn't an actual health need? I have always thought covering viagra but not birth control pills was ridiculous. Fertility treatments are extremely expensive. Does universal health care cover this sort of thing? What treatments would be considered optional? Will preventive colonoscopies and mammograms be allowed? Who decides the priorities of coverage. If we allow someone like that woman to decide, we will pay thousands of dollars for her to get pregnant, while denying others the right to choose not to!

Given that we live in a real world, we have to make choices that are effected by incentives and resources.

Too true. And I really want more answers before I throw out the baby with the bathwater, as dirty as our bathwater has become.

(heard a funny line the other night-- when you throw the baby out with the bathwater, all you get is a wet, injured baby)



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (76183)7/24/2008 10:38:55 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 543225
 
It is obvious that the solution exists.

I think it's obvious that there probably ISN'T one.