Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Ecclesine who wrote (27525)	7/25/2008 12:30:37 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

Is the way of the future "larger contiguous blocks" of spectrum, or software defined radio capable of agile frequency selection from a multitude of blocks in what are commonly regarded now as disparate bands of spectrum? ------

To: Peter Ecclesine who wrote (27525)	7/25/2008 12:47:09 AM
From: ftth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

re: Loea, somehow, spectum up at 70GHz doesn't seem too relevant for these types of nationwide deployments. I guess we'll see. What do you mean by "China, Japan and Korea proposed to use 3.1-4.9 GHz" ? The countries (as represented by the regulators) are proposing this? Isn't that UWB spectrum (or in any case, not unencumbered spectrum)? PS ever give any thought to how much a 2x100MHz spectrum block would go for at auction? You could probably deploy FTTH to the whole US for that amount.