SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Moominoid who wrote (37761)7/31/2008 5:00:58 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 218043
 
several measures to put the economy back on its feet. The first step is for the Fed to raise interest rates to 4%, to assure that institutional depositors maintain their deposits in the banking system, and thereby defend the banking system against the attempts by the British to weaken U.S. banks by luring the deposits to London. While this step will not solve the larger crisis, it will help keep capital in the U.S., capital which will be necessary for recovery projects. It will also give the Brits a bloody nose, and teach them a needed lesson about the dangers of looting the United States.

Once the interest-rate policy has been put into place, we can move to phase two, beginning with the passage of the Homeowners and Bank Protection Act (HBPA). The HBPA would erect a firewall to protect homeowners from foreclosures, and begin the process of putting the financial system through bankruptcy. Necessary functions like food production and delivery, education, health care, and the like would continue, while the huge mass of speculative derivatives bets, securities, and such would be frozen, to be sorted through later. Among the essential services to be protected, ironically, would be banking, as a functioning banking system is essential to the operation of an economy, and to the rebuilding process which is required. However, we should stress that we are talking about protecting functions, not institutions, and that saving the banks in many cases means saving them from the people who now run them. Many of the banks will have to be reorganized.

Having erected the firewall, the rebuilding can begin, using low-interest-rate directed credit to repair and upgrade our depleted infrastructure, rebuild our manufacturing base, and implement new technologies to lift the entire economy into a new era of productivity. This includes the large-scale development of nuclear power and the building of high-speed magnetically levitated (maglev) trains to deal with our transportation problems; large-scale water projects and desalination to address the growing water shortages in the Western states, especially; and other projects of the same kind. These projects, far from costing us money, will, in the long run, increase the productive power of the economy, creating wealth far in excess of their costs.

At the same time as we begin rebuilding, we can enter into agreements with other nations, particularly, Brazil, Russia, India, and China (the BRIC nations) to carry out these policies on a global scale. With such a bloc committed to national sovereignty and international cooperation, the power of the British Empire and the Anglo-Dutch Liberal slime mold can be broken, finally freeing the world from its deadly embrace.

These policies, based upon the proven American System of Economics, are what built the strongest economy in the history of the world: Alexander Hamilton used them, Lincoln used them, FDR used them—they are proven, and they work. But time is running out, and we must act quickly.

"We're on a very short fuse," LaRouche said recently. "We have the policy. We have the approach, it will work: It's the only damned thing that will work! Either we win and get this through, or you can kiss the United States goodbye. And that's in the short term, not the long term.... The system is dead! The patient is dying. We're on a death-watch, by the bedside of the patient. The patient is the U.S. economy. You're sitting by the bedside while the patient is dying."

"I've already defined the only possible solution. Nothing else will work," LaRouche continued. "Everything else is a waste of time. The system is dead: It's the walking dead. It's finished! Either you put in a new system, and there's only one way to do it, or the United States and the system are dead! And the whole world goes down with it."

larouchepub.com



To: Moominoid who wrote (37761)7/31/2008 3:22:17 PM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 218043
 
Scientist warns about granite bench tops and radiation

Published: Wednesday, 30-Jul-2008
Printer Friendly Email to a Friend



Miscellaneous News

A scientist in the U.S. has issued a warning concerning the use of granite bench tops.
Physics Professor W.J. Llope has suggested that some granite counter tops have high amounts of uranium that could create a health risk for humans.

The Rice University professor says gamma radiation and radon gas produced by uranium-rich stones used to make the bench tops could cause cancer in humans.

Professor Llope reportedly tested 55 stones of 25 varieties of granite stones purchased from local dealers and found some homeowners would be exposed to 100 millirems of radiation in just a few months - this exceeds the annual exposure limit set by the Department of Energy for visitors to nuclear laboratories.

Some stones he tested were apparently imported from Brazil and Namibia and contained hazardous levels of radiation.

According to Professor Llope most granite in terms of radioactivity are safe but some he tested were extremely 'hot'.

The Marble Institute of America (MIA) has dismissed the claims as 'junk science' and say the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says radon gas and radiation released from granite countertops do not pose a risk.

On his website, Llope says there is no safe threshold for radiation and the general guideline is that each rem of radiation would cause cancer in 4 people in a population of 10,000 - some granite countertops he tested reportedly released 1 rem of radiation in just 250 hours or 10 days.

The MIA says scientific standards and protocol need to be established which allow consistent testing in a logical fashion and that repeated studies have found that granite is safe.

The EPA however does acknowledge that "it is possible for any granite sample to contain varying concentrations of uranium that can produce radon gas and some bench tops may contribute variably to indoor radon levels but also says there is a dearth of reliable data on the issue"..

ELMAT:
The bold shows someone wants money for more useless reasearch.

If you see an Iran bound boat load of granite kitchen tops you know the Iranians want to use it to power atomic bombs!!





To: Moominoid who wrote (37761)7/31/2008 6:35:56 PM
From: RealMuLan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218043
 
[so maybe a good time for you to shop for a house?<g>]--Australia Facing `Once-in-100-Year' Housing Slump (Update1)

By Jacob Greber

bloomberg.com