SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (255032)8/1/2008 1:12:11 PM
From: mas_Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Is it a bribe by a definition reasonable people would agree on and if so was it company policy?

Lol, so you think millions can be authorised with it being company policy ? Yes it was a bribe and yes it was company policy. The EU will also prove it for me as I don't believe this case would have been brought without overwhelming irrefutable evidence.



To: Elmer Phud who wrote (255032)8/1/2008 3:58:50 PM
From: fastpathguruRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
accusations of "evil Intel" require that it be an explicit bribe/exclusion of AMD and that it be company policy, not an implicit exclusion or the act of a rogue agent.

Sorry, lack of a paper trail does not exonerate Intel:

A) You can't exclude the possibility of an "evil Intel" who is good at covering their tracks, and

B) While a paper trail would be a slam dunk conviction (and you can't exclude this possibility based on your personal lack of knowledge re: EU's evidence), it will be enough to convict Intel if the effects of Intel's loyalty rebates on OEMs are sufficiently coercive.

(Is this new "evil Intel" meme the birth of a new talking point?)

BTW, has Intel identified your world-traveling, untrackable-discretionary-rebate-wielding rogue agent yet? Maybe they should put out a reward for his capture. You should help Intel out by giving them all the evidence you have of his existence.

fpg