SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mas_ who wrote (255036)8/1/2008 1:47:43 PM
From: Elmer PhudRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
It could have been verbal and probably was knowing how criminals work. So it doesn't have to be written.

So there was no agreement that specifically excluded AMD but just a wink and a nod followed by bags of cash. Maybe a body or two just so they'd take things seriously. Even though nothing was written down you know it happened because Intel is criminal by nature and evil incarnate. The policy must have been handed down verbally too from the top so there would be no record. That way when no evidence turns up that specifically names AMD you can still be right. That sounds perfectly reasonable.

I knew you wouldn't commit to believing there was real evidence which explicitly named AMD because you don't believe it either.



To: mas_ who wrote (255036)8/1/2008 3:43:29 PM
From: rzborusaRespond to of 275872
 
Mas, So it doesn't have to be written ... just proven to exist.

Yes, it does, also, Barrett's DNA has to be found on the document.

Any thing less is just a rogue sales person with bags of cash, it could happen.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News