SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jet.Screamer who wrote (138492)8/1/2008 4:42:51 PM
From: Jim McMannisRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
That about sums it up.

I doubt even the staunchest Republicans are pleased with Bush.



To: Jet.Screamer who wrote (138492)8/1/2008 5:01:29 PM
From: Peter VRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
"die hard republicans who think Bush is great ..."

Exactly where are those two people?

Bush has the lowest approval rating ever, not sure there are many R's who think he is great anymore.

americanresearchgroup.com

hist.umn.edu

pollingreport.com

I think this points out the differences between the candidates pretty well:

jibjab.com

It's highly recommended viewing.



To: Jet.Screamer who wrote (138492)8/3/2008 10:46:33 AM
From: Dan3Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
Re: I find myself sandwiched between die hard republicans who think Bush is great and a tax cut will save us and dedicated democrats who think Obama is god. Personally I think Obama, McCain and Hillary would all sell their soul to be president.

You're falling for a rather weak argument: since neither candidate is perfect, there's no difference between them.

The fact is, one of the candidates is better than the other, and the country will be better off if the better candidate wins.

Just because Mother Teresa overslept one morning and isn't perfect, it doesn't mean there's no moral difference between her and Adolf Hitler - but that's basically what you're arguing.