To: dvdw© who wrote (38591 ) 8/12/2008 9:39:03 PM From: TobagoJack Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218031 <<his opinion matters because of the record....dont you think?>> thus prompted by you, i respond, yes, most definitely, haim's opinion matter, especially given that his opinions are not held alone, on china and other equivalent subjects, and that is precisely why i took him and continue to take him seriously, and he says he supports the destruction of chinese culture and achievement to date because his brood cannot work at a profit without learning, saving and investing Message 24839490 , and enough on this board wanted to see my support for the claim Message 24839188 , possibly including your goodself.question: would hitler be in agreement with haim on this Message 24839490 <<If China would not take the appropriate steps to lift the standard of living of their own population on their own expense, I would fully support a forceful action such as a declaration of war to destroy most of China recent achievement. It will cost a lot human sacrifice and human lives ? So be it! Some were politicians must get it or pay the consequence>>. answer, yes. question: had haim been chinese, and wrote the same drivel about israel, what would folks be saying and doing? advice: do not go there, for the thread would be inundated with posts once shown hardly disputable support, some folks decided to claim in unison, to simultaneously take haim seriously and not seriously. am not sure how that process works. as to<<nuclear weapons are obsolete.....the high ground wont allow it anyway so, the surmise rested on a faulty foundation to begin with>> by that measure all weapons are obsolete, and since that is not the case, and not in george s.ossetia where haim would like to start a new war, thus haim's plans, while based on a faulty foundation, if faithfully followed by enough automatons as those who followed hitler, will still lead to disaster. so, as haim cheered on folks to help the underdog, i figured we should do so, but in your opinion, i am guessing i cheered for the wrong underdog, and instead should also advocate haim's line, namely bomb china, attack russia, pulverize s.ossetia, etc etc in any case, for the umteenth time, i already noted Message 24842148 <<no matter, as unless prompted, the matter is closed afaiac>> , especially given that there are no possible upsides to any one continuing the following threads of thoughtsMessage 24841767 unless metacomet thinks otherwise or Message 24839490 haim decides to chime in in the mean time, again, the matter is closed cheers, tj p.s. i cannot fathom why you think there is an upside in this discussion, but should you continue to believe so, be my guest