SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (39069)8/20/2008 12:43:30 PM
From: Amark$p  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217825
 
Yes I see the news on how the new government cannot agree on reinstating judges, you view this as positive...?

"Pakistan's ruling coalition, fresh from ending a six-month standoff by forcing President Pervez Musharraf to resign, failed to resolve a festering dispute over reinstating judges he fired. The government's inability to reach a compromise will continue to distract the four-party alliance as Pakistan suffers from faster inflation, a slowing economy and rising Islamic militancy on its border with Afghanistan."

What you term "self determination" in your prior post, I would classify better as likely "civil war". I certainly agree in principal with the right of self determination, as long as this does not lead to civil war. But my point remains, per the Stratfor article, Pakistan military can likely no longer effectively restore stability without even worse consequences.

You need to stop thinking in terms of "relic of Cold War" and start thinking in terms of Civil War within Pakistan, and worst case, a new Pakistani conflict with India/Kashmir. (see Google news on Kashmir for recent articles).

Please provide me with facts on why you believe:
"Pakistan has now a bright future".
I want to believe you, just give me some reasons for hope.