Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (410449)	8/25/2008 9:19:06 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574679

"Are you saying that such children should be aborted to save health care costs?" No. But claiming they are viable at that weight is disingenuous. They aren't. Using extraordinary measures, some can be saved and go on to live normal lives. But, certainly not all. Depending on the weight, probably not most.

To: i-node who wrote (410449)	8/25/2008 9:51:31 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574679

they're twisting it to justify their party plank of abortion on demand and killing the elderly. Catch Pelosi on abortion Sunday: rushlimbaugh.com Watch the nonsense... youtube.com

To: i-node who wrote (410449)	8/26/2008 12:32:27 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 1574679

some lefty will decide which babies get a chance at living and which must be aborted because they're too expensive? Thats exactly what liberals want.