Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (413099)	9/3/2008 2:11:09 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575781

Joe, Ted is for the other side so dont try to convince him. The better things are for the US the worse he sees it. You can see the nuance between his posts and the posts of other liberals like Al, JF, CJ and even parsons. They are all clearly americans and love their country. Ted is rooting for the enemy. He made that clear the other day.

To: tejek who wrote (413099)	9/3/2008 2:17:46 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575781

Ted, Four thousand dead, over 25k wounded and a trillion dollars spent is a medium wrong to you??? Scary. I said "starting". The US has gotten to half a dozen to a dozen of these types of conflict over time. Some turn out quick and easy, some turn out more difficult. This kind of war doesn't get won on a dime or in a particular time frame. Its not likely we will know for at least decade who won in Iraq. I couldn't agree more. But Obama (and many on this board, including you) advocated losing it on a dime... Joe