SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (135375)9/9/2008 6:55:38 PM
From: d[-_-]b1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Oh please. Standard healthcare plans don't pay for pregnant children. The only reason Palin's does is because she is on the public dole as a public servant. And Bristol Palin doesn't have a JOB that can pay for this child, she is relying on State of Alaska oil revenue payouts. She basically lives off of one payout or another and thats her lifestyle.

Is there a cogent thought in there someplace - Bristol lives at home, her parents take care of her - she's not on any public assistance.

So did you get that the program funding was not cut?



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (135375)9/9/2008 7:40:24 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
You are a true idiot. lol Really! How do you make such crazy claims of a young woman who lives at home and is a legal dependant of the father and mother?



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (135375)9/9/2008 7:45:27 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
You failed to acknowledge your lie about Palin cutting funding.

If her parents have a family policy, it would cover a pregnancy by any family member.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News