Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (268557)	9/14/2008 2:49:26 PM
From: ManyMoose	Respond to of 793862

That would make sense, but having all the filler tubes on the same side would make even more sense. I hate it when you come to a pump and the only way to get your filler tube in place is to face another vehicle head on.

To: LindyBill who wrote (268557)	9/14/2008 2:58:36 PM
From: goldworldnet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793862

But I am surprised that they don't have a pump/nozzle connection that will only fit diesel. It's a commonsense solution and I thought the same. * * *

To: LindyBill who wrote (268557)	9/14/2008 6:03:03 PM
From: Ish	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793862

In the army I drove a multi-fuel deuce and a half that would run on diesel or gas. Hell, it would run on cooking oil. I think running a diesel modern car on gas is the compression ratio. Might blow the engine plus the cylinders wouldn't be properly lubed.