Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (70412)	9/16/2008 4:07:24 PM
From: carranza2	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Except for one rather important point, we agree. The point is this: One must always assume human frailty/stupidity/greed when making large policy decisions such as the ones St. Alan of Greenspania made. Human nature in all its splendor and weakness must be taken into account for the people are indeed in large measure sheeple. This he did not do. One cannot assume perfect rationality on the part of greedy creditors and prudence on the part of prospective debtors when deciding to make a large money supply available to all at near gratis rates any more than one can expect children to not avail themselves of a bucket full of candy when the only parental restraint is 'eat candy until you retch.' One had to assume that with easy money and buckets of it to lend, creditors would lend to a bankrupt newspaper boy and that the newspaper boy would sign on the dotted line for he knew that never in his life would he so easily be handed such huge gobs of money. His view of things is perfectly rational: This is the good life I'm bering offered, it might not last, but what the hell, I'll enjoy it while I can. The greedy lender for his part is sending off the dicey mortgage for packaging into ABS deals no one understands but which produce bounteous incomes and fees for all involved. It may not last either but, what the hell, the bonuses and salaries are great. No one had an incentive to be prudent. However, both sets of parties perceived incentives, rational from their perspective, to do exactly what they did. In the larger scheme of things, this was of course a disaster in the making which has now been made. However, so long as the money candy store is open, caution is thrown to the winds for short term gain. If the world were full of prudent and rational people like you, no problems would arise from keeping the candy store open. But it is most assuredly not a world of prudent and rational folks who see beyond short term gain. Failing to take this into account was the signal error Greenspan made when he opened up the candy store for everyone to loot at bargain prices for debtors and at incredible profits for creditors. The proof is in the making, Mq. Look at where we are now.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (70412)	9/16/2008 4:15:15 PM
From: KyrosL	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Greenspan's huge error was not pushing for tighter regulation, even as he was seeing irrational exuberance breaking out all over. Exuberance that he partially caused by keeping rates at 1% for so long.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (70412)	9/16/2008 4:15:54 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	7 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

One of the Fed's responsibilities is to regulate lending to assure the soundness of the banking system. Alan Greenspan refused to do this, but said he was doing so. If he disagreed with this obligation he was charged with carrying out, he should have either resigned because his job was not to his taste, or at least publicly stated that he refuse to do his job. Let's say you had hired an electrician who unbeknown to you refuses to use copper wire because he thinks it's not necessary so uses aluminum instead - so later your home burns down. Are you really off your rocker to blame the electrician? After all it isn't his fault that he was able to purchase aluminum wire. And after all, if you really cared about your home, you should have been there to follow his every move. But you trusted him, so you're a nutter. .