SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (421730)10/2/2008 9:58:20 AM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574710
 
Precisely. Her dancing around tells us she doesn't know and is unwilling to be upfront about it.

Amazingly enough, the question on the supreme court case should have been an easy one for her...the supreme court recently reduced exxon's liability for the valdez spill by a lot of money...more than $2B. It affects Alaska and more importantly Alaskans...I can't imagine that she was not in tune with that one...

Al



To: combjelly who wrote (421730)10/2/2008 11:20:11 AM
From: Taro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574710
 
...if she said "i don't know" she'd do a lot less damage than to respond with the air headed bullshit she comes back with..."

Sure, and if he had said "yes I did" as opposed to "I didn't have sex with that woman" he'd done a lot less damage.

Oops, that was a seasoned dem president and Sara is only an aspiring young veepee candidate.

Taro



To: combjelly who wrote (421730)10/2/2008 12:45:39 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574710
 
Absolutely...if she said "i don't know" she'd do a lot less damage than to respond with the air headed bullshit she comes back with..."

Precisely. Her dancing around tells us she doesn't know and is unwilling to be upfront about it.


From what I've read, that's been her MO for a long time.