SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Henry Niman who wrote (9858)10/21/1997 9:21:00 AM
From: Arthur Radley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
 
Henry,
I think Stephen was making reference to the statement ..."despite the widespread anticipation leading up to it" and a side comment I made when I posted a recap of thestreet.com article.

Actually I was surprised that Eisinger didn't state that because of recent conversations with one Henry Niman and a subsequent laudatory letter to thestreet.com from one TexasDude, he felt compelled to write this follow-up story about LGND and LLY(:>)



To: Henry Niman who wrote (9858)10/21/1997 9:31:00 AM
From: Hippieslayer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
 
Henry,

I'm sensing that you might have been offended by what I wrote. I had no intention of doing so if you were offended.

I find it funny that thestreet has gone out of their way to mention you in a previous article and then the thread yesterday. This is just a thread were people can throw around ideas, news, etc, yet thestreet is using this thread as a news source Ie that we were concerned with yesterday's stock performance. TO put it simply, I don't think we should be used as a news source.



To: Henry Niman who wrote (9858)10/21/1997 8:30:00 PM
From: Hippieslayer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
 
Henry, re post 9858.

I finally figured out what happened with my mistake of this thread being mentioned in thestreet. I read the article that Texasdude posted. he inserted a sentence about the thread which I took to be part of the actual article. That's why I was baffled when I read the actual article this morning and didn't see what I though I had read last night.