Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bruce Dorval who wrote (5523)	10/21/1997 9:43:00 AM
From: PAinvestor	Respond to of 25960

Bruce, perhaps it is an internal update and as such will not be a report, so ask your broker to check there as well. Some internal stuff (ie. not for you & I to see) however slip through the net as compliance in Japan is not as strict as here in the U.S. Nice open from the tech sector. CYMI at 28.5 Would be interested if anyone can tell if the good KLAC #'s bode well for CYMI. They did mention that new orders came from existing fabs and not new ones. In fact some 80% of their growth in wafer inspection equipment as they are "increasingly confronted by smaller linewidth technologies" Regards....PAinvestor

To: Bruce Dorval who wrote (5523)	10/21/1997 10:59:00 AM
From: sepku	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25960

Regarding the SB report that was posted at AOL. There seems to be confusion over when it was issued. Apparently it is a very old report from the 2nd week of September. An individual on the CYMI board at AOL checked it out and found that this report was written by the same SB analyst who originally reported the "problem" with Cymer's lasers, causing the stock to plummet on Sept 12 immediately following the stock split. The same day Cymer and Nikon issued press releases denying any such "problems". The report is genuine and can be found on Bloomberg. The conclusion is that this report has no relevance to Cymer today, having already been denied by both parties of concern the day it was issued. It was silly to have brought it back up in the first place...no reason to raise the dead. Also, the person who reposted this old article at AOL has offered to fax anyone a copy of the actual report. You can email him at: GriffinMrX@aol.com . Style Pts.