SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (256470)10/7/2008 4:29:45 PM
From: neolibRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
They can't actually make their processors there. No biggie.

I'm afraid you are the one not seeing the big picture. If what you claimed were correct, then AMD just went out of business. Duping the Arabs would be beside the point, they would have had to dupe themselves.

You are making an argument that they withheld information to sucker the Arabs into this deal, meanwhile, the deal is going to doom AMD??

Intel's statement makes perfect sense. They are simply expressing a view that the confidential parts of the agreement, which clearly they know about, are significant enough that they would think a 3rd party doing a deal of this magnitude would have wanted more than AMD's assurances that they are not an issue, i.e. they would want enough detail from AMD that it would have violated the agreement in providing that level of detail. Nothing wrong with Intel voicing that opinion. If AMD does not have substantial proof of how the negotiations were conducted, they might have trouble (ala Intel loosing internal emails for instance?).

But your claims that they either violated the agreement or duped the Arabs is nonsense based on the available information. It could of course prove that they did (perhaps even both violated the agreement and duped the Arabs) just like it could prove they did neither. TWT.



To: Elmer Phud who wrote (256470)10/7/2008 4:31:10 PM
From: mas_Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
According to Meyer, the deal is "consistent with all of [AMD's] IP licensing agreements," including its X86 license with Intel.

Hell, what does he know ! ;-)

extremetech.com

AMD's graphics chips, which are made in foundries owned by TSMC, will be shifted to TFC once it installs bulk silicon manufacturing equipment. TFC could manufacture AMD's graphics chips beginning in late 2009 or 2010, he said.



To: Elmer Phud who wrote (256470)10/7/2008 4:38:21 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
It's pretty obvious Intel violated the terms of the licensing agreement by telling you, since you claim to know exactly what is in there.

Petz