Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (56384)	10/7/2008 4:56:00 PM
From: Oral Roberts	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

I'm not as down on Sarah as you are and think she is likely about as qualified as Clinton was. With that said I think a third party vote is the same as voting for Obama. With that said I think you should pull the curtain, take a nip from the bottle you snuck in and pull the lever for who you think would do the least damage. I have my opinions on who that would be but they aren't all that compelling so your on your own. I would ad though all the power being in one parties hands is not good and grid lock is wonderful. All these clowns had done up until this crisis is name post offices and that isn't all bad:) You know this cycle is bad because I'm a registered Republican and I think McCain sucks. Sad commentary that this is the best and the brightest.

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (56384)	10/7/2008 5:39:22 PM
From: mph	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

A vote for a third party is a wasted vote, imo. I'll freely tell you that I am voting AGAINST Obama. Period. The Veep candidates are largely irrelevant to me. I am more concerned with the people Obama will bring with him and those he will appoint. He owes his soul to radicals and people like Soros. His so-called vision of change is nothing more than the usual lib policies of tax and spend, just a little more heavily sugar-coated with supposedly eloquent prose. Sounds like you were almost suckered in by what I consider to be the Dem's game plan this year. Package a very left agenda in a black so that white guilt can be tapped into and people can feel that they're part of something historic. That's why Hillary was defeated. The party fathers didn't think they could push that agenda with a white woman. They needed a black man. That's why the race card has been played so often. Can't criticize Obama without that charge being leveled. If you can't call an empty suit an empty suit, there is something very wrong.