Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale Baker who wrote (90665)	10/18/2008 5:05:46 PM
From: Katelew	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 541877

I'm not familiar enough with government workings to really understand the full role of Senate ML. What I THINK I know, lol, leads me to think that she could be effective in the role. She's a tireless worker, patient with details, and has persuasive abilities similar to Bill's in both substance and style. I've been told by people who've worked with them both that she actually works more efficiently than Bill...not as much schmoozing. And she doesn't have the temper outbursts that intimidate people that Bill had. So if these are qualities that would help her as Senate ML, then I would think she would acquit herself well and probably much better than Harry Reid. I don't understand how or why Reid or Pelosi both occupy the positions they do.