To: Rambi who wrote (276761 ) 10/26/2008 1:58:05 PM From: KLP Respond to of 793843 I totally agree, Rambi....Your rant of the day is mine also. Somehow the schools, the unions, and thus the society, has, because of being so PC, believed that we can educate everyone as if all were equal. Fortunately, and unfortunately, we are not. Some kids need more care than others. We have had two teachers in the family. from 1935 through 2005. Both have had Masters, and one with more than enough credits for a Doctorate -- the other with multiple degrees. Both taught in public schools. One in a smallish community of about 10-15,000 people, with one high school. Her position of course was very visible. The other taught in the central area of a well known town in NY with a population of about 200,000 or so. It would seem to me that we look at what the private schools are doing that is turning out educated kids, and graduating them...compare the costs, and apply those standards to the public schools. There is a considerable difference in cost between the private schools and the public schools. We could half that difference, and apply that amount to the education and/or training of those who are special needs kids. The other half of the difference could be used in other ways as the community sees fit. A good friend of mine was a teacher in one of the best private schools in this area. If those teachers don't measure up to the expectations of the school and the parents who pay the bills, that teacher is no longer there. It should be the same for public schools. I think the taxpayers should be much more involved in the curriculum and the expectations of both the teachers and the students, as well as the expectations we have for the administrators of the entire educational community. How many administrators do we have for each school district and what is each expected to do? What are the results of those expectations.