Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (430799)	10/28/2008 11:39:51 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573558

"Again, a clueless statement. It totally depends upon the circumstances." Not clueless at all. At the point that a business is generating that kind of income, most other factors are minor. You are taking a model of a mom and pop, where the income is about what a regular person earns, and trying to apply the same sort of rules to a much larger business. Which is disingenuous. At best. Either you don't know what you are talking about, or you are deliberately distorting this. My money is on the latter.

To: i-node who wrote (430799)	10/28/2008 12:29:04 PM
From: bentway	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573558

You guys are arguing about fantasies. How many working slobs have a fantasy about owning the business they work for? ALL of them? How many actually do it? 1 in 10,000,000? What is it with you wingnuts and fantasy? Saddam had the intention to re-start his WMD programs and had he done so, might have possibly given WMD's to some terrorist in the future! We better INVADE the mofo! It's so EASY arguing fantasies. They're so MALLEBLE, unlike facts. Fantasy argument defeated? Change the fantasy!