Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (96323)	11/16/2008 9:27:18 PM
From: Katelew	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541931

Thank you, thank you, thank you!! Somebody gets the point I was trying to make. Obviously, I failed to explain myself well, and you have done it eloquently. Both cases were studies in competing civil rights. And in both cases, it seemed to me that the courts didn't have to rule in such a way that one important civil right was subordinated to another. But as you said, that would have involved 'calling a spade a spade' and this might lead to sensible compromises. Can't have that. <gg> We can acknowledge that some freedom of association was lost in the cause of equal protection without undermining equal protection. Brilliant.