Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (62312)	11/22/2008 4:36:58 PM
From: forceOfHabit	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78408

E. Charters, Pathetic. Juvenile. My reaction would be to systematically shell their ports and sink all their boats until they get their shit together and police their own. Don't worry, with 3 weeks of naval bombardment and they will come up with a plan. They already did. Something about airplanes and tall buildings. Dirty nukes, biological weapons, etc. coming soon to a repressive regime (courtesy of "Homeland Security") near us. Kill them all and let God sort them out. Or Allah. Or somebody. habit

To: E. Charters who wrote (62312)	11/22/2008 4:59:06 PM
From: AuBug	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 78408

There would be no collateral damage. I guess you have no appreciation for the sophistication of a US nuclear attack. Spread the word that a zone of safety is to maintained around ships at sea and all boats closing on an intercept vector will be considered armed aggressors subject to torpedo target practice.