Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (3378)	12/6/2008 8:14:21 PM
From: RetiredNow	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86355

Agreed. But it's the best process we have...one that goes through the scientific review process. As far as saying that the folks who believe in global warming are trying to criminalize dissent, I don't agree with that at all. The only one who seems to be stifling open debate has been the Bush administration, Cheney especially, who redacted large portions of EPA reports from scientists who posited that warming was linked to pollution. So we have seen massive evidence of this gov't stifling scientific thought. However, I haven't seen the global warming crowd stifle the other side. I have seen them, myself included, write derisive posts and articles on those who disbelieve, but that is a far cry from censorship. The Bush administration has actively censored free thought in this area.