SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Heart Attacks, Cancer and strokes. Preventative approaches -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (2414)12/6/2008 10:32:36 PM
From: FJB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39297
 
You can just put a filter on your tap. This system is way overboard.



To: Joe NYC who wrote (2414)12/6/2008 11:03:44 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39297
 
Looks exactly like the unit I used to own. My three filters were in clear plastic so I could see their condition. No big deal.



To: Joe NYC who wrote (2414)12/7/2008 3:10:03 PM
From: Suma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39297
 
I had a special spigot with my Reverse Osmosis unit. It used twenty five gallons of water as I recall to produce one gallon of drinking water. You might want to check these facts out.

I had this installed in my home in 1986 and used it for ten years. I think they may do better now so I am no judge of
consumption in todays machines.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News